The Forgiveness Machine: How Bangladesh’s Courts Were Turned Into a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card for the Ruling Family

84 cases against Tarique Rahman. Zero convictions standing. Every BNP-era corruption case from 1/11 — discharged, acquitted, or quashed. This isn’t justice. It’s a machine. And it runs on the same fuel every time: political power.

Let me tell you a story about how justice works in Bangladesh.

No, that’s not right. Let me tell you a story about how justice doesn’t work in Bangladesh. Let me tell you about a machine — a forgiveness machine — that takes guilty people and makes them innocent, not by proving they didn’t do it, but by making the cases against them disappear.

This machine has been running since July 2024. In the twelve months since BNP returned to power, it has processed every single corruption case from the 1/11 era and produced the same result every time: not guilty. Every case. Every charge. Every conviction. Wiped clean.

Tarique Rahman’s 84 cases? Gone. Shamim Iskander’s corruption case? Discharged. The August 21 grenade attack convictions? Overturned. Lutfozzaman Babar’s death sentence? Quashed. The Orphanage Trust conviction? Overturned. The money laundering conviction? Acquitted. The arms haul charges? Collapsed. Every single one.

Now, I can already hear the objection: “These were all politically motivated cases filed by the Awami League to persecute BNP.” And I’ll grant you this: the Awami League absolutely used the legal system as a weapon. They filed cases for political purposes. They targeted opponents. They manipulated the judiciary. None of that is in dispute.

But here’s the thing about the forgiveness machine: it doesn’t distinguish between legitimate acquittals and political cover-ups. It doesn’t examine evidence. It doesn’t weigh witness testimony. It doesn’t consider the public record. It simply takes the political moment — the return to power — and converts it into legal absolution.

And when every single case produces the same result — when 84 out of 84 cases against one person are resolved in his favor — you’re not looking at justice. You’re looking at a system that has been re-engineered to produce a predetermined outcome.

So let me walk you through the machine. Step by step. Case by case. And you can decide for yourself whether this looks like justice or something else entirely.

The Input: 84 Cases Against One Man

Let’s start with the most extraordinary statistic in Bangladesh’s legal history.

Between 2007 and 2024, 84 cases were filed against Tarique Rahman. Eighty-four. Let that number sit for a moment. That’s not a typo. That’s not a political talking point. That’s the number of criminal cases — corruption, money laundering, murder conspiracy, arms trafficking, tax evasion — that were filed against a single human being.

Now, the Awami League government filed many of these cases. Some were genuine. Some were politically motivated. Some had strong evidence. Some had weak evidence. The point isn’t whether every case was meritorious. The point is what happened to all 84 of them.

After the July 2024 uprising brought BNP back to power, courts acquitted Tarique Rahman in every single case. Not most. Not nearly all. Every. Single. One.

Eighty-four cases. Zero convictions. A perfect score.

In any functioning legal system, the probability of winning 84 out of 84 cases — even with the best lawyers money can buy — approaches zero. Not because every case was weak. But because in any system with even minimal independence, some cases have stronger evidence than others, and the law, if applied consistently, should produce a mix of outcomes. A 100% acquittal rate across 84 cases doesn’t suggest innocence. It suggests a system that has been captured.

But let’s look at the specifics, because the details matter.

Case Study 1: The Money Laundering Conviction

On June 7, 2007, the Anti-Corruption Commission filed a money laundering case against Tarique Rahman and his close friend and business partner Giasuddin Al Mamun. The case involved Tk 20.41 crore (approximately $2.5 million at the time).

The case went to trial. Evidence was presented. Witnesses testified. And on November 18, 2013, a trial court acquitted Tarique Rahman.

But that wasn’t the end. On July 21, 2016, the High Court overturned the acquittal and sentenced Tarique to 7 years’ imprisonment. The High Court found that Tarique Rahman had “influenced political power to help his close friend, Giasuddin Mamun, to get and then launder 200 million taka ($2.5m).” The Deputy Attorney General confirmed this to AFP.

This was a conviction. By a High Court. After a trial. With evidence. With witnesses. With a paper trail.

Then BNP returned to power.

On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court stayed the 7-year sentence. And on March 6, 2025, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court acquitted Tarique Rahman and Giasuddin Al Mamun.

A conviction. Overturned on appeal. After a change of government.

If this were a one-off, you might say: “The appeal process worked. The higher court found problems with the conviction.” But it’s not a one-off. It’s the pattern. And the pattern is: conviction under one government, acquittal under the next. Every time. Without exception.

Case Study 2: The August 21 Grenade Attack

This one is different from a corruption case. This is about murder.

On August 21, 2004, 13 military-grade Arges grenades were thrown into a crowd of 20,000 people at an Awami League rally on Bangabandhu Avenue in Dhaka. 24 people were killed. Over 500 were injured. Sheikh Hasina survived with permanent hearing damage.

The investigation, the cover-up, and the eventual trial took 14 years.

Let me be clear about what happened during the BNP government’s tenure: the state actively covered up the attack. The crime scene was washed with detergent. Recovered grenades were deliberately destroyed. A petty criminal named Joj Mia was tortured into giving a false confession. A one-man judicial commission led by Justice Joynal Abedin produced a sham report blaming “foreign and local enemies” — and two years later, Abedin was elevated to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, apparently as a reward.

After 1/11, the real investigation began. Mufti Abdul Hannan confessed. The CID built a case. And on October 10, 2018, a Speedy Trial Tribunal convicted 19 people to death and 19 people to life imprisonment, including:

• Lutfozzaman Babar — BNP’s State Minister for Home Affairs (death penalty)
• Abdus Salam Pintu — BNP Deputy Minister for Education (death penalty)
• Tarique Rahman — BNP acting chairman (life imprisonment)
• Harris Chowdhury — Political Secretary to PM Khaleda Zia (life imprisonment)
• Brig Gen (Retd) Abdur Rahim — former NSI DG (death penalty)
• Brig Gen (Retd) Rezzakul Haider Chowdhury — former DGFI DG (death penalty)

This was one of the most significant terrorism trials in Bangladesh’s history. The court found that the attack was “a well-orchestrated plan, executed through abuse of state power.” The evidence included confessional statements, grenade forensics, witness testimony, and a paper trail connecting the attack to Hawa Bhaban — Tarique Rahman’s parallel power center.

Then BNP returned to power.

In December 2024, a reconstituted High Court acquitted all 49 individuals — including Tarique Rahman, Lutfozzaman Babar, and every single person convicted of planning and executing a grenade attack that killed 24 people. In September 2025, the Supreme Court upheld the acquittal.

Every conviction. Overturned. Every death sentence. Quashed. Every life sentence. Erased.

Twenty-four people were killed by military-grade grenades thrown into a political rally. The state covered it up. The investigation found the truth. The courts convicted the perpetrators. And then the perpetrators’ party returned to power and every conviction was wiped away.

If you’re keeping score at home: 24 dead. Zero convictions standing.

Case Study 3: The Shamim Iskander Discharge

We covered this in detail in our last article, but it’s worth revisiting in the context of the forgiveness machine.

Shamim Iskander — Khaleda Zia’s brother, the man who looted Biman Bangladesh Airlines — had a corruption case filed against him on May 5, 2008, with 36 witnesses listed in the charge sheet. The charges: Tk 1.33 crore in illegal acquisition and Tk 81.81 lakh in concealment.

Thirty-six witnesses. Documented financial irregularities. A paper trail connecting Shamim to aircraft lease kickbacks, procurement fraud, and systematic looting of the national airline.

On March 25, 2025 — four months after BNP’s return to power — a Dhaka court discharged Shamim Iskander. Not acquitted after a full trial. Discharged — meaning the court decided there wasn’t enough evidence to even proceed to trial. With 36 witnesses.

And then, in March 2026, Shamim Iskander sat in the VIP gallery at the 13th Parliament’s inaugural session. From accused to VIP. In less than a year.

Case Study 4: The Orphanage Trust

Khaleda Zia was convicted in the Zia Orphanage Trust corruption case — a case involving the misappropriation of Tk 2.1 crore meant for orphans. The money was allocated for a trust named after her husband, Ziaur Rahman, to benefit orphaned children. Instead, it was diverted.

The conviction stood for years. Khaleda Zia was imprisoned. The case was one of the most symbolically powerful in Bangladesh’s legal history — a Prime Minister stealing from orphans.

After BNP returned to power, the conviction was overturned.

Let me be clear about what this means. The Zia Orphanage Trust case wasn’t about a technicality. It was about money earmarked for the most vulnerable people in society — children without parents — being diverted to political use. And the forgiveness machine wiped it away.

The Machine’s Operating Manual

So how does the forgiveness machine actually work? What are the mechanisms that convert convictions into acquittals and evidence into irrelevance?

Mechanism 1: Delay until political winds shift.

The most common tool is also the simplest: delay. Cases languish in the system for years. Witnesses die, move away, or lose interest. Evidence degrades. Paperwork is lost. And then, when the political moment arrives — when the accused’s party returns to power — the case is suddenly ready for resolution. The delays aren’t accidental. They’re the machine’s first stage.

Shamim Iskander’s case was filed in 2008 and discharged in 2025 — 17 years later. The August 21 grenade attack took 14 years from crime to conviction (2004-2018) and then was overturned within 12 months of BNP’s return. The Tarique Rahman money laundering case was filed in 2007, convicted in 2016, and acquitted in 2025. In every case, the timeline favors the accused.

Mechanism 2: Reconstitute the bench.

When a case finally reaches the appellate stage after years of delay, the judges hearing it have often been appointed or influenced by the government currently in power. Bangladesh’s judiciary has a long and well-documented history of responding to political pressure — not because every judge is corrupt, but because the appointment, promotion, and transfer system creates powerful incentives for alignment with the ruling party.

We documented this in our article on the Chief Justice age extension — BNP literally amended the constitution to extend the retirement age of Supreme Court justices to ensure their preferred Chief Justice would oversee the caretaker government. If they were willing to amend the constitution to capture the judiciary in 2004, what makes anyone think they wouldn’t use their current power to influence judicial outcomes in 2025?

Mechanism 3: Discharge, don’t acquit.

Notice that Shamim Iskander’s case was discharged, not acquitted. There’s a legal distinction that matters enormously. An acquittal means “we examined the evidence and found the defendant not guilty.” A discharge means “we didn’t even think there was enough evidence to proceed to trial.” Discharge is the lowest bar for closing a case — it doesn’t prove innocence. It doesn’t examine evidence. It simply says: “we’re not going to bother.”

When a case with 36 witnesses and documented financial irregularities gets discharged rather than going to trial, the message isn’t “this person is innocent.” The message is “the system has decided not to pursue this.” And in Bangladesh, “the system” and “the ruling party” have been indistinguishable for decades.

Mechanism 4: The “politically motivated” blanket defense.

BNP has one defense for every case: “politically motivated.” All 84 cases against Tarique Rahman? Politically motivated. The Orphanage Trust case? Politically motivated. The grenade attack convictions? Politically motivated. Shamim’s corruption case? You guessed it.

And let me be fair: some of these cases were politically motivated. The Awami League absolutely weaponized the legal system against its opponents. But “politically motivated” doesn’t mean “false.” It means “the decision to pursue this case was influenced by political considerations.” The evidence in many of these cases — documented financial trails, witness testimony, forensic evidence, confessional statements — existed independently of the political motivations behind the prosecutions.

The forgiveness machine doesn’t distinguish between the two. It treats “politically motivated” as a magic phrase that erases all evidence, all testimony, all documented wrongdoing. And it works because the courts — under the current political arrangement — have no incentive to distinguish between genuine acquittals and political cover-ups.

Mechanism 5: The witness problem.

After 17+ years of delays, witnesses become a problem. They die. They move. They forget. They’re intimidated. They’re bought. The Shamim Iskander case had 36 witnesses. How many of those witnesses were still available, still willing, and still reliable after 17 years? In a country where witness intimidation is systemic and where the accused’s family controls the government, the witness problem becomes an acquittal pipeline.

The Scorecard

Let me put this in a table, because numbers tell a story that words sometimes can’t.

BNP-Era Corruption and Criminal Cases: Resolution After Return to Power (2024-2026)

Tarique Rahman — Money Laundering (Tk 20.41 crore): Convicted 2016 (7 years). Acquitted March 2025. ✅

Tarique Rahman — 84 total cases: All acquitted/discharged 2024-2025. ✅

Lutfozzaman Babar — August 21 Grenade Attack (death penalty): Acquitted December 2024. ✅

Abdus Salam Pintu — August 21 Grenade Attack (death penalty): Acquitted December 2024. ✅

All 49 accused — August 21 Grenade Attack: Acquitted December 2024. ✅

Shamim Iskander — ACC Corruption Case: Discharged March 2025. ✅

Khaleda Zia — Zia Orphanage Trust: Conviction overturned. ✅

Harris Chowdhury — Multiple cases: Outcomes aligned with BNP return. ✅

Every case. Every charge. Every conviction. Resolved in favor of the ruling party.

Now let me show you the other side of this scorecard — the side the forgiveness machine doesn’t touch.

Victims Still Waiting for Justice (2026)

24 people killed in the August 21 grenade attack: Zero convictions standing. ❌

Ivy Rahman — died 3 days after the grenade attack: No justice. ❌

600+ people killed by RAB in “crossfire”: No accountability for BNP-created death squad. ❌

44 people killed in Operation Clean Heart custody: Indemnity law (later struck down, but no prosecutions). ❌

18,000+ Hindu women raped during 2001 post-election violence: 25 MPs implicated, zero convictions. ❌

Purnima Rani Shil — gang-raped for being a polling agent: 11 convicted (under AL government). ❌

12.1 million fake voters: Voter rolls corrected, but no accountability for the fraud. ❌

Shamsunnahar Hall — 200 women assaulted by police: No action after 12+ years. ❌

Biman Bangladesh Airlines — Tk 250 crore looted: Case discharged. ❌

The forgiveness machine works in one direction. It forgives the powerful. It has no setting for the victims.

Why This Can’t Be “Politically Motivated Cases, Politically Resolved”

I want to address one more time the argument that all of this is just the natural correction of a corrupt system — that the Awami League filed politically motivated cases, and now those cases are being properly dismissed. It’s an attractive argument. It’s simple. And it’s wrong.

Here’s why.

First: The evidence doesn’t disappear because the motivation was political.

Tarique Rahman’s money laundering case had a paper trail. The High Court examined that paper trail and found it convincing enough to convict and sentence him to 7 years. That paper trail — the bank records, the transactions, the connections to Giasuddin Al Mamun — didn’t vanish when BNP returned to power. The evidence remained. What changed was the court’s willingness to consider it.

The August 21 grenade attack case had confessional statements from the attackers. It had forensic evidence linking the grenades to military stockpiles. It had witness testimony placing the planning meetings at Hawa Bhaban. It had a full trial with a 974-page verdict. All of this evidence didn’t become false because the courts reversed the convictions. The evidence remained true. The courts chose to disregard it.

Second: The pattern is too perfect to be coincidental.

If the justice system were functioning independently, you would expect a mix of outcomes. Some acquittals, some upheld convictions, some reduced sentences, some dismissals on technical grounds. What you would not expect — in any system with even minimal independence — is a 100% success rate for one side.

The Awami League, which controlled the government for 15 years (2009-2024), couldn’t get a single major BNP corruption conviction to stick once BNP returned to power. Not one. If the cases were purely political, you’d expect at least some of them to have enough real evidence to survive appellate review. But none did. Not because the evidence was weak. But because the political moment demanded a different outcome.

Third: The victims have been abandoned twice.

The people who were killed, raped, and robbed during BNP’s rule were first denied justice by BNP’s own government (2001-2006), then used as political props by the Awami League (2009-2024), and are now being told that the convictions that were supposed to bring them closure were “politically motivated” and therefore invalid. They’ve been abandoned by both parties. Their suffering has been instrumentalized by one side and then erased by the other. And the forgiveness machine grinds on, processing case after case, producing acquittal after acquittal, while the victims’ names are forgotten.

The International Dimension

There’s one more aspect of this that deserves attention: the international response, or rather, the lack of one.

When the US Embassy in Dhaka described Tarique Rahman as a “symbol of kleptocratic government” in a 2008 diplomatic cable, that was an official assessment by the United States government, based on intelligence and diplomatic reporting. When the US Treasury sanctioned RAB — the death squad BNP created — it was an official act by the US government acknowledging that a Bangladeshi state institution was responsible for extrajudicial killings.

When Transparency International ranked Bangladesh as the most corrupt country in the world for five consecutive years (2001-2005), that was a data-driven assessment by the world’s leading anti-corruption organization. When Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the International Crisis Group documented systematic human rights abuses under BNP rule, those were credible, source-backed reports from the world’s most respected human rights organizations.

And yet, when BNP returned to power in 2026, the same international actors who had documented all of this were issuing statements about “democratic transition” and “partnership.” The US Embassy that once called Tarique a “symbol of kleptocratic government” now issues diplomatic notes about “cooperation.” The UK government that hosted the family’s money now awards their media operations. The international community, which once sanctioned and condemned, now celebrates and collaborates.

The forgiveness machine isn’t just domestic. It has an international wing. And it works the same way: wait long enough, change the political context, and the same facts that once produced sanctions and condemnations will produce handshakes and aid packages.

What the Machine Produces

So what does the forgiveness machine actually produce? Not justice. Not accountability. Not closure for victims. It produces something far more dangerous: impunity with a legal seal.

When every case against the ruling family is resolved in their favor, the message isn’t “they were innocent.” The message is: “If you have enough power, the legal system will produce whatever outcome you need.” And that message doesn’t just protect the powerful. It reshapes the entire society’s understanding of what law is for.

Law, in the forgiveness machine’s universe, isn’t a mechanism for holding the powerful accountable. It’s a mechanism for legitimizing their power. Cases are filed when you’re out of power, creating the appearance of accountability. Cases are resolved when you return to power, creating the appearance of exoneration. The cycle repeats. The machine runs. And the people who were killed, robbed, and raped by the state’s agents watch from the sidelines as their suffering is processed, delayed, dismissed, and ultimately erased.

This is what institutional capture looks like. Not a single corrupt judge. Not one bad ruling. But a system — a machine — that consistently, reliably, and completely converts political power into legal absolution. Every input produces the same output. Every case ends the same way. The machine doesn’t make mistakes. It doesn’t produce anomalies. It doesn’t occasionally convict the powerful by accident. It is designed for a purpose, and it fulfills that purpose with mechanical precision.

The Precedent We’re Setting

There’s a question that nobody in Bangladesh’s political establishment wants to ask, because the answer is too frightening: what precedent does this set?

If the forgiveness machine works for BNP today, it will work for whoever comes next tomorrow. If 84 cases against one person can be wiped clean because his party controls the government, then any future government can wipe clean any cases against its own leaders. The machine is party-agnostic. It doesn’t care who’s in power. It only cares that someone is.

This is the real tragedy of the forgiveness machine. It’s not just that BNP’s leaders are escaping accountability for corruption, violence, and murder. It’s that the mechanism they’re using to escape — the systematic capture and manipulation of the judiciary — becomes available to every future government. The Awami League used it. BNP is using it. The next government will use it. And each cycle of use makes the machine stronger, more efficient, more normalized.

The victims of today become the precedent for tomorrow. The acquittals of 2024-2026 become the legal foundation for the acquittals of 2030, 2035, 2040. Each round of forgiveness makes the next round easier, more expected, more routine. Until “justice” in Bangladesh means nothing more than “whatever the ruling party says it means.”

And in that world, the 24 people killed by grenades on August 21, 2004 don’t just die. They die twice — once from the explosion, and once from the system that was supposed to deliver justice for their deaths and chose instead to forgive their killers.

What We’re Not Saying

I want to be careful about what I’m not saying here. I’m not saying that every case filed during the Awami League era was meritorious. I’m not saying that the 1/11 anti-corruption drive was pure and unbiased — it wasn’t. I’m not saying that the Awami League government didn’t weaponize the legal system against its opponents. It absolutely did.

What I’m saying is simpler and more disturbing: when every single case against the ruling party’s leaders is resolved in their favor, the pattern is not evidence of innocence. It’s evidence of a captured system. And when that system then produces acquittals for people convicted of murder — not corruption, not tax evasion, but murder — the machine has gone beyond forgiving corruption. It has forgiven killing. It has declared, with the full authority of the courts, that grenades thrown into a crowd of 20,000 people are not a crime worth punishing — not because the evidence changed, but because the government changed.

That’s not justice. That’s the forgiveness machine. And it’s running right now, in Bangladesh, in 2026, processing cases and producing acquittals and telling 170 million people that the law is whatever the ruling party says it is.

The 24 people who died on August 21, 2004 deserve better than a machine. They deserve better than a system that “forgives” their killers every time the political winds shift. They deserve a legal system that remembers what happened to them even when the government would prefer to forget.

But that’s not the system they have. And until the machine is dismantled — until the courts are truly independent, until cases are tried on evidence rather than political expediency, until the powerful are held to the same standard as everyone else — the machine will keep running. And the next time the government changes, the new leaders will use the same machine to forgive their own people. And the cycle will continue.

Because that’s what machines do. They run. They don’t care who’s operating them. They just run.

---

Sources:

• Bangladesh High Court (July 21, 2016): Tarique Rahman sentenced to 7 years for money laundering, Tk 20 crore fine
• Appellate Division of Supreme Court (March 6, 2025): Acquittal of Tarique Rahman and Giasuddin Al Mamun
• Speedy Trial Tribunal-1, Dhaka (October 10, 2018): August 21 grenade attack verdict — 19 death sentences, 19 life sentences
• Bangladesh High Court (December 2024): Acquittal of all 49 individuals in August 21 grenade attack case
• Bangladesh Supreme Court (September 2025): Upheld acquittal in August 21 case
• The Daily Star (March 25, 2025): Discharge of Shamim Iskander from ACC corruption case
• Anti-Corruption Commission charge sheet (2008): 36 witnesses, Tk 1.33 crore illegal acquisition, Tk 81.81 lakh concealment
• Dhaka Tribune (March 2026): Shamim Iskander in VIP gallery at 13th Parliament inaugural session
• WikiLeaks Cable 08DHAKA1143: US Embassy describes Tarique Rahman as “symbol of kleptocratic government”
• Transparency International CPI 2001-2005: Bangladesh ranked most corrupt country in the world for five consecutive years
• Human Rights Watch: World Report 2008 (Bangladesh chapter)
• Amnesty International: “Bangladesh: Attacks on members of the Hindu minority” (AI Index: ASA 13/006/2001)
• US Treasury Department: Sanctions on RAB (December 2021)
• Dhaka Tribune (July 2014): “No action taken against any accused in 12 years” (Shamsunnahar Hall raid)
• Banglapedia: Anti-Corruption Commission entry — 110 convictions in 79 cases during 1/11 drive

Series 10 — The Dynasty Files | Article #76

Bangladesh Untold documents what happened. What you do with that information is up to you.